| 
				This post was updated on .
			 
		CONTENTS DELETED
			 The author has deleted this message. | 
| 
				This post was updated on .
			 
		Hi Erman,
 Need your help in understanding the numbers/objects for each edition from below output SQL> ========================================================================= = Covered Objects per Edition ========================================================================= EDITION_NAME ACTUAL STUB TOTAL --------------- -------- -------- ---------- ORA$BASE 1 0 1 V_20170104_1115 0 1 1 V_20170105_1144 2 1 3 V_20170904_1329 0 3 3 V_20170905_1612 0 1 1 V_20170920_1550 0 1 1 Below is object list for the same ========================================================================= = Covered Objects ========================================================================= EDITION_NAME OWNER OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_TYPE DROP_ORDER --------------- --------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ---------- V_20170920_1550 APPS XXSAR_AP_ROOC_INT_PKG PACKAGE 6 V_20170905_1612 APPS XXSAR_AP_ROOC_INT_PKG PACKAGE 6 V_20170904_1329 APPS XXSAR_AP_ROOC_INT_PKG PACKAGE 6 V_20170904_1329 APPS FND_CONCURRENT_PROGRAMS_VL VIEW 7 V_20170904_1329 APPS GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_KFV VIEW 7 V_20170105_1144 APPS XXSAR_AP_ROOC_INT_PKG PACKAGE 6 V_20170105_1144 APPS FND_CONCURRENT_PROGRAMS_VL VIEW 7 V_20170105_1144 APPS GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_KFV VIEW 7 V_20170104_1115 APPS FND_CONCURRENT_PROGRAMS_VL VIEW 7 ORA$BASE APPS FND_CONCURRENT_PROGRAMS_VL VIEW 7 Please help Thanks, sri | 
 
	
					
		
	
					| Administrator | 
		obsolete editioned code objects = covered objects. 
 A standard cleanup operation removes them.. So, drop_order is probably the order of removing them. Probably, one after another.. With an order, adop drops them. This drop_order is an undocumented thing. But, when I see the output that you sent, I can make an opinion like the following; Packages are dropped before the views, because a view can be used by a package. (as you see in your output, package drop order is 6, view drop order is 7) So dropping the package first, can be a good thing. So, my opining is that, it is related with the dependency.. As for the actual and stub -> “actual” - a real object in the current edition "stub" - the object definition was inherited from a previous edition | 
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page | 
 
	

 
	
	
		

